| 4/14/07 GOVERNMENT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO BAR DEFENDANTS FROM PRESENTING TESTIMONY, EVIDENCE, OR ARGUMENT CONCERNING ALLEGED POLITICAL MOTIVATION FOR THE PROSECUTION |
MOTION:...moves this Court for an Order precluding the defendants, counsel for the
defendants, and defendants’ witnesses from mentioning, referencing, introducing,
offering, or attempting to introduce or offer any evidence, testimony, or argument that
politics was a motivating factor in the government’s decision to prosecute the
defendants. As grounds for this motion, the United States submits that recent filings
by the defendants indicate that they, in particular Defendant Siegelman, intend to
improperly interject politics into the trial of this public corruption case. For the
reasons stated herein, the government anticipates that Defendant Siegelman plans
to present testimony, evidence, or argument to the effect that this case is the product
of political motivations. < LINK TO THE DOCUMENT> 66 PAGES.pdf
defendants, and defendants’ witnesses from mentioning, referencing, introducing,
offering, or attempting to introduce or offer any evidence, testimony, or argument that
politics was a motivating factor in the government’s decision to prosecute the
defendants. As grounds for this motion, the United States submits that recent filings
by the defendants indicate that they, in particular Defendant Siegelman, intend to
improperly interject politics into the trial of this public corruption case. For the
reasons stated herein, the government anticipates that Defendant Siegelman plans
to present testimony, evidence, or argument to the effect that this case is the product
of political motivations. < LINK TO THE DOCUMENT> 66 PAGES.pdf
 |  |  |  |  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
It is a fact: The Presiding judge, a Bush appointee, refuses to investigate juror
misconduct. Eight emails have surfaced post conviction which if authenticated by the
judge would require a new trial. The judge has refused to investigate the emails.
< see CNN/ YouTube interview of Senator Davis questioning Gonzoles>
It is a fact: The judge is a substantial stockholder (40%) in Doss Aviation Company
which was notified of a possible contract award from the United States Government
in February, 2006 after Judge Fuller took this case and on May, 2006 during jury
deliberations Doss Aviation was awarded a $178 Million Dollar contact renewable
annually by the United States. The Judge is listed as the registered agent and the
Federal Court House address is used as the address of the Registered Agent for
Doss Aviation.
misconduct. Eight emails have surfaced post conviction which if authenticated by the
judge would require a new trial. The judge has refused to investigate the emails.
< see CNN/ YouTube interview of Senator Davis questioning Gonzoles>
It is a fact: The judge is a substantial stockholder (40%) in Doss Aviation Company
which was notified of a possible contract award from the United States Government
in February, 2006 after Judge Fuller took this case and on May, 2006 during jury
deliberations Doss Aviation was awarded a $178 Million Dollar contact renewable
annually by the United States. The Judge is listed as the registered agent and the
Federal Court House address is used as the address of the Registered Agent for
Doss Aviation.
| Judge in Siegelman case refuses to investigate jury misconduct. |
.........................................................................
| __________________________________________________________________________________________ Sponsored by Friends of Don Siegelman 2007 <feedback> __________________________________________________________________________________________ |
 |  |  |  |
| Recent Press > |
Questions....
Sloppy Law?
Sloppy Law?