.........................................................................
    ........................................................................................................................................
    U.S. District Judge Mark Everett Fuller
    Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller,
    U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
    and stakeholder & former President of Doss Aviation

    Mark Fuller presided over the Siegelman trial and refused to
    recuse himself as judge in spite of a serious conflict of interest
    as president of Doss Aviation (and others like Aureus
    International) that has major contracts with the US Government
    and the Department of Justice. The DOJ is the party bringing the
    case against Siegelman. Judge Fuller not only ignored the
    number of serious conflicts of interest in this case, he also
    diminished and defended serious jury mis-conduct. Fuller was
    appointed by President Bush and is a former member of the
    Executive Committee of the Alabama Republican Party.

    According to some sources, Mark Fuller was the judge to whom
    the case was "shopped" when Judge Clemons of the Northern
    District Birmingham dismissed it with prejudice. In fact, moving
    the case out of the district in which it was initiated so as to evade
    the control of the federal judge to whom it was assigned was the
    first clear-cut sign of prosecutorial misconduct in the history of
    the Siegelman prosecution.

    Federal Judge Mark Fuller supported jury misconduct when he
    denied motions for a new trial that were based on claims by
    Siegelman and Scrushy that jurors discussed the case through
    e-mails during 2006 two-month trial. In December 2006 Fuller
    ruled that juror actions on the Internet did not warrant throwing
    out the bribery convictions. [See content of one of the e-mails in
    the left bar.]

    After harsh sentencing of Don Siegelman, Fuller explained that
    “I am convinced the conduct Gov. Siegelman engaged in
    damaged the public’s confidence in the government of this
    state,” Fuller said.

    .................................................................................................................................

    Conflicts of Interest

    On October 4, 2007  Federal Judge Mark Fuller issued an
    order defying the 11th Circuit Court order that he show cause
    for denial of Siegelman’s Appeal Bond. On the same day,
    October 4, 2007,  (according to AFX News) The U.S. Air Force
    awarded a $18.1 million contract to Doss Aviation Inc. in
    Colorado Springs, Colo., for flight screening for USAF pilot
    candidates. Furthermore, AFX News reports that Federal Judge
    Fuller is a former president of and a key investor in Doss
    Aviation Inc., a private company that receives major contracts
    from the Air Force and other branches of the military. The
    company manages and supplies fuel and airport services as well
    as uniforms and equipment for military use through Aureus
    International, which shares an address with Doss Aviation.

    The judge is a substantial stockholder (40%) in Doss Aviation
    Company which was notified of a possible contract award from
    the United States Government  in February, 2006 after Judge
    Fuller took this case and in May, 2006 during jury
    deliberations Doss Aviation was awarded a  $178 Million Dollar
    contact renewable annually by the United States. The Judge is
    listed as the registered agent and the Federal Court House
    address is used as the address of the Registered Agent for
    Doss Aviation.

    <link to 'compromised judge' on Simpson page>

    .................................................................................................................................
    Jury Misconduct in his courtroom

    And how does one reconcile jurors e-mailing other jurors during
    the trial, contrary to the trial judge's express instructions? That
    alone should entitle Scrushy and Siegelman to a new trial.
    Surely the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta cannot allow
    such a gross abuse of the jury system to remain as a precedent.

    This was not mere harmless error. One e-mail dated June 25,
    2006, at 10:41 p.m. stated "Gov and pastor (Scrushy's
    nickname) up s--t creek, all public officials are scum; especially
    this one; pastor is really a piece of work...they missed before,
    but we won't...also keep working on (another juror)."


    ....................................................................................................
    Stonewalling

    As of January 1, 2008 Judge Fuller has defied the orders of the
    11th Circuit Court of Appeals and his duty as a judge to produce
    a timely transcript.

    On September 27th, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ordered
    District Judge Mark Fuller to show cause for denying Don
    Siegelman an appeal bond and ordering Siegelman’s immediate
    incarceration.

    On October 4th, Fuller refused the appeal court’s order saying,
    “ [This Court] will not issue a lengthy written opinion on this
    matter.”

    On October 7th the 11th Circuit again ordered Judge Fuller – for
    a second time – to show cause for denying Siegelman’s appeal
    bond and ordering Siegelman’s immediate incarceration.

    As of January 1, 2008, Don Siegelman had been imprisoned for
    over six months with no explanation as to why he was denied an
    appeal bond. It has been over a year and a half since
    Siegelman’s trial ended and no trial transcript has been
    produced by Fuller's court.

    On January 2, 2008, over three months after the first request for
    an explanation of his ruling, and two months after the second
    request Judge Fuller issued a 30 page order that said he
    refused to allow former Gov. Don Siegelman out on bond while
    his case is on appeal because he did not believe Siegelman had
    raised a legal issue that was likely to get his case overturned.

    However, Siegelman can not appeal his conviction without an
    official trial transcript, which is still pending.

    .......................................................................................................................................

    More about Judge  Mark Fuller
    <link to 14 blogs on Fuller at Harper's>


    ........................................................................................................................................


__________________________________________________________________________________________

Sponsored by Friends of Don Siegelman  2007
<feedback>
__________________________________________________________________________________________
JUDGES
MARK FULLER
.........................................................................
Mark Fuller
Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller,
U.S. District Court for the Middle
District of Alabama and
stakeholder and  former President
of Doss Avaitaion
photo from alabar.com
Press and Media for February 2008
Conflict of  Interest
...........................
In the first chapter of the
Code of Conduct
for United States Judges,
it says, in part:

"...a judge ... should not serve
as an officer, director, active
partner, manager, advisor, or
employee of any business
other than a business closely
held and controlled by
members of the judge's family.",
<link to the whole code>
.........................................................................
Emails between jurors in
the Siegelman Trial

The first of the e-mails, copies of  which
were received in late December 2006,
dated June 25, 2006; It was attached as
EXHIBIT 23 to the Renewed
Motion for a New Trial. EXHIBIT 23
appears to be a copy of an e-mail sent on
the Gmail account of Juror B to the
e-mail account of Juror C at 10:09 p.m.
Sunday night, June 25, 2006. This e-mail
states in its entirety."


"....judge really helping w/jurors...

still having difficulties with #30

...any ideas???

keep pushing on ur side

did not understand ur thoughts on

statute but received links.

[first  name of Juror B]

EXHIBIT 23
.........................................................................